Skip to content
All articles

Aeroacoustic Analysis of an Automotive HVAC System with Flow360

Aerodynamic noise in automotive HVAC systems matters more in the electric vehicle era. This case study predicts it directly with Flow360, a GPU-native CFD solver, and compares the sound pressure spectra against experiment.

Validation
2024. 12. 12

1. Overview

This case study uses Flow360, a next-generation GPU-native CFD solver, to analyse aerodynamic noise in an HVAC system. Flow360 resolves unsteady flow quickly and accurately through massively parallel GPU computation, which makes it cost-effective to study the main sources of HVAC aeroacoustic noise.

Background

As vehicle electrification accelerates, engine noise and the structural vibration that comes with it have fallen sharply. Secondary noise sources that used to be masked by the engine are now significant factors in passenger comfort. Aerodynamic noise generated inside the automotive HVAC system is a prime example.

Beyond the blower itself, flow separation and vortices caused by structures inside the duct produce broadband noise, and in some cases tonal noise as well. This has a direct effect on the acoustic quality of the cabin.

The problem

HVAC noise analysis has traditionally relied on anechoic chamber testing or on coupling high-fidelity CFD with an acoustic solver. Conventional CFD–acoustic coupling, however, is very expensive to compute, and there are real limits to exploring design concepts with it at an early stage. Reviewing several duct geometries or optimising across operating conditions has therefore been difficult.

The approach

Recent progress in GPU computing has made massively parallel computation practical, and both the cost and the turnaround of CFD analysis have fallen substantially. We therefore set out to predict aerodynamic noise inside an HVAC system directly with Flow360, one of the GPU-native CFD codes. Flow360 is optimised for unsteady flow analysis and can capture the complex flow inside the duct along with the noise generation mechanisms that follow from it.

2. Geometry and grid

The model used here comes from a study led by a consortium of German automotive companies. It is a rectangular duct with a 90-degree bend and a flap installed inside to generate vortices. To reduce GPU memory the computational domain was simplified to a half-sphere (Fig. 1), and microphones were placed on the duct wall around the flap so that noise can be measured (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 Computational domain for the HVAC duct
Fig. 1 Computational domain for the HVAC duct
Fig. 2 Microphone positions in the HVAC duct
Fig. 2 Microphone positions in the HVAC duct

The mesh is particularly dense at the inner bend, around the flap and in the exit region, so that the vortex formation induced by the flap and the resulting pressure propagation are captured accurately (Fig. 3). For details of the experimental configuration and the numerical method, see the paper by Jäger et al. (1).

Fig. 3 Mesh with local refinement around the flap
Fig. 3 Mesh with local refinement around the flap

3. Solver settings

The flow and pressure fields were computed with an implicit LES turbulence model. Flow360 is a density-based, GPU-native Navier–Stokes solver; the specific schemes used here are as follows.

Grid and discretisation

  • Grid system: node-centered unstructured grid
  • Numerical method: second-order finite volume method
  • Convective terms: Roe Riemann solver
  • Viscous terms: central difference method
  • Spatial discretisation: MUSCL extrapolation

Time discretisation and run conditions

  • Time step: Δt = 1.0 × 10⁻⁴ s
  • Hardware: two NVIDIA A10 GPUs
  • Runtime: about 6 hours for 9,600 steps (0.96 s of physical time)

4. Results

The sound pressure spectra agree well with the experiment across the whole frequency range, which suggests that Flow360 reproduces the vortices generated by the bend and the flap properly.

SPL versus frequency at microphone 1
SPL versus frequency at microphone 1
SPL versus frequency at microphone 2
SPL versus frequency at microphone 2
SPL versus frequency at microphone 6
SPL versus frequency at microphone 6

Some discrepancy appears below 100 Hz — at microphone 2 the difference reaches about 5 dB at the 25 Hz bin. This is most likely because the short sampling time makes high accuracy hard to achieve at very low frequencies. Even so, the peak near 80 Hz is predicted correctly at every microphone.

Above 100 Hz in particular, the broadband noise characteristics track the experimental curve very closely, and the prediction is notably better than that of other CFD codes.

Pressure fluctuation at 0.6 s
Pressure fluctuation at 0.6 s

5. Conclusions

This case study indicates that Flow360 can predict noise generated inside an HVAC system with reasonable accuracy. The sound pressure spectra predicted at the measurement points closely resemble the experimental values, which demonstrates that a GPU-native CFD solver can simulate aerodynamic noise effectively within a short turnaround.

References

  1. Anke Jaeger, Friedhelm Decker, Michael Hartmann, Moni Islam, Timo Lemke, Joerg Ocker, Volker Schwarz, Frank Ullrich, Bernd Crouse, Gana Balasubramanian, Fred Mendonca and Roger Drobietz. “Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Noise Generated by a Flap in a Simplified HVAC Duct,” AIAA 2008-2902. 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). May 2008.

Want to know more about Flow360? Flow360 product page · Flexcompute documentation

Continue reading

Validation

UV Fluence Rate Simulation with the MSSS Model

A UV fluence rate simulator built on the MSSS model replaces the full radiative transfer equation with an absorption-dominant simplification. It predicts the radiation field in water treatment and semiconductor UV systems effectively, and agrees closely with measurement even in real reactor geometries.

Case Studies

Data Center Cooling Airflow Analysis with Boreas

A case study analysing data center cooling airflow with Boreas, an FFD-based solver. The subject is a measured 151-rack, 344 kW facility whose layout and operating conditions are published, and the analysis produces the steady-state temperature field and per-rack inlet and outlet temperatures.

Next step

Assessing a similar problem?

Tell us the geometry, the operating conditions and the decision you need to make, and we will scope it with you.